June 25, 2025 Ward 3 Affordable Housing News Digest
Government Activity
District of Columbia
OP Files Cleveland Park & Woodley Park Rezoning Proposal
On June 16, the Office of Planning (OP) filed an application with the D.C. Zoning Commission (Case 25-09) for map and text amendments to implement the Connecticut Avenue Development Guidelines in Cleveland Park and Woodley Park. If approved, the amendments would create new mixed-use zones: the Cleveland Park Neighborhood Mixed Use Zone (NMU-8A/CP) and the Woodley Park Neighborhood Mixed Use Zone (NMU-9A/WP).
OP asked in its Setdown Report that IZ+ be applied to both of the new zones, meaning that any new development would be required to meet heightened requirements for affordable housing under the inclusionary zoning program. The Commission is scheduled to consider at its June 26 meeting whether to set the matter down for a public hearing. Urban Turf has a brief story.
Donohoe Seeking Zoning Commission Approval of Friendship Heights PUD
As we previously reported (September 22, 2024 News Digest), last fall Donohoe (under the name Harrison Wisconsin Owner LLC) filed a planned unit development (PUD) application with the D.C. Zoning Commission for a 127-unit residential project at 4201 Garrison Street N.W., just off Wisconsin Avenue behind another Donohoe building, a 210-unit project currently in the permitting process at 5151 Wisconsin Avenue N.W. The Zoning Commission has now scheduled a public hearing on the application for July 14 at 4:00 p.m.
The filing in Zoning Commission Case No. 24-12 says that, by leveraging the District’s High-Area Need Tax Abatement (HANTA) program, the applicant proposes to set aside 33% of the new project’s residential units for affordable housing. “The Applicant will set aside 10% of the main building [gross floor area] and the penthouse habitable space at the 50% and 60% MFI levels, with the remaining 23% set aside for households with incomes up to and including 80% of the MFI, in accordance with the HANTA program.” More details can be found in the applicant’s Prehearing Statement.
On June 12, ANC 3E (Friendship Heights) voted unanimously to adopt a resolution supporting the application, along with a memorandum of understanding memorializing a community benefits agreement with Donohoe.
ANC 3/4G Extends Civic Core Survey Deadline
The deadline has now passed for submitting public comments to the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (DMPED) on the eight proposals to redevelop the Chevy Chase library and community center site (Civic Core), and add affordable housing.
ANC 3/4G (Chevy Chase) asked for and received an extension to July 10 for it to submit a resolution to DMPED reflecting community input. Due to a delay in sending postcards to households within the ANC to inform them of the ANC’s community survey regarding the proposals, the ANC has extended the deadline for responding to that survey to June 29. The survey can be found here.
ANC 3/4G will hold a special meeting on July 7 to consider the results of the survey and formulate its input to DMPED. In anticipation of the special meeting, the ANC’s survey working group will meet on June 30 to review the survey results and discuss next steps; register for that meeting here.
City to Acquire Properties on Georgia Avenue
On June 17, the D.C. Council voted unanimously to approve emergency legislation to spend $2.8 million to acquire six parcels along Georgia Avenue N.W. that are facing foreclosure. Chris Kain at District Links reported that “Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development Nina Albert described it as an opportunity to shape a cohesive project with substantial housing on a key block just south of Missouri Avenue, with the six lots adjacent to a former fire station at 5760 Georgia Ave. NW still owned by the District government but eyed for redevelopment.”
Albert said, "Our specific plans as to how we would redevelop them has not been determined." But Ward 3 Councilmember Matt Frumin said, "This is exactly the kind of thing we should be doing," citing the opportunity for D.C. officials to maximize the amount of affordable housing. "This is a great result."
Bisnow also has a story.
Del. Norton Proposes Change in Zoning Commission Appointments
Chris Kain at District Links reports that on June 23, D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton introduced proposed federal legislation to change the appointment process for the D.C. Zoning Commission. Currently, three of the five commissioners are nominated by the mayor, subject to confirmation by the D.C. Council. A fourth represents the Architect of the Capitol, and the fifth is appointed by the Director of the National Park Service.
Norton’s proposed “District of Columbia Zoning Commission Home Rule Act” would provide for all five Zoning Commission members to be nominated by the mayor and confirmed by the Council. "This bill is an essential step to increase home rule in the District of Columbia," Norton said in a press release. "Land use is a local matter in every situation, no matter the context. The federal government loses nothing because the interests of the federal government in land use in the nation's capital are protected by federal law.”
Virginia
Appeals Court Sends Adverse Decision on Arlington Missing Middle Zoning Back to Trial Court for Further Proceedings
ARLnow reports that on June 24, the Virginia Court of Appeals issued a ruling that reverses a circuit court decision last fall that voided Arlington’s Missing Middle zoning changes.
The disposition doesn’t reach the merits of the legal arguments at the heart of the lawsuit, which seeks to overturn Arlington’s Expanded Housing Options (EHO) ordinance allowing for the development of multi-unit buildings in previously single-family neighborhoods. Instead, the appeals court ruled that developers who had previously received EHO permits are “indispensable parties” that need the opportunity to be included in court proceedings.
The court sent the case back to the lower court for further review, saying, “[W]e reverse the circuit court’s judgment declaring the Amendment void and prohibiting the Board from acting under the Amendment and remand the cases to the court so necessary parties may be added if the appellees are so inclined.”
In a press release, Virginians Organized for Interfaith Community Engagement (VOICE) praised the ruling, calling it “a major victory for housing equity and inclusion in Arlington County.” “A small group of wealthy homeowners spent their time and resources trying to lock the doors behind them — to preserve a status quo that has kept too many people out for too long,” said the Rev. Ashley Goff. “This ruling says loud and clear: Arlington’s future isn’t reserved for the few.”
Maryland
Montgomery Council Committee Advances Transit Corridor Zoning Proposal
According to Bethesda Today, the Montgomery County Council’s Planning, Housing and Parks Committee voted 2-1 on June 23 to advance a proposed zoning text amendment that would increase the amount of housing allowed in certain zones along the county’s transit corridors. The bill will now move to the full council for a vote.
The legislation is part of the More Housing N.O.W. (New Options for Workers) legislative package, which aims to allow more residential building types — including duplexes, triplexes, townhomes and apartments — along the county’s transit corridors, with a requirement that 15% of a project’s proposed housing be affordable workforce housing.
Federal
HUD Moving Headquarters to Alexandria
According to Bisnow, on June 25 Scott Turner, the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced that the agency will move its headquarters from Southwest D.C. to the National Science Foundation (NSF) building at 2451 Eisenhower Ave. in Alexandria. “It’s time for a change,” Turner said. No timeline was given for the agency transition, nor has a new home for NSF been announced.
HUD has been housed at the brutalist Robert C. Weaver Federal Building since 1968. That’s one of a cluster of federal buildings in Southwest D.C. that the GSA intends to offload.
Washington Business Journal [subscription req’d], The Washington Post, and The New York Times [gift link] also have stories.
Senate Reconciliation Bill Includes LIHTC Increase
According to Multifamily Executive, the legislative text of the Senate reconciliation bill recently released by Senate Finance Committee chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) includes a permanent 12% increase in low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) authority. The Senate plan to permanently increase LIHTC allocations beginning in 2026 differs from the House bill, which calls for a 12.5% increase for four years.
The Senate version of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” also seeks to permanently lower the bond financing threshold test from 50% to 25%. The House version would also lower the bond test to 25%, but for just four years.
Adoption of the LIHTC provisions would accomplish major goals of the Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act, which affordable housing advocates have been working to pass.
Proposal to Sell Public Lands Faces Pushback
Deseret News reports that Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) is hinting at possible changes to his proposal for selling off millions of acres of public land, amid growing opposition to the provision among conservative circles (as well as environmental groups). Lee’s bill, tucked into a larger bill of energy-related provisions meant to offset trillions of dollars in proposed tax cuts in President Trump’s reconciliation package, proposes to sell between 2.2 million and 3.3 million acres of federally owned land across 11 states — Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming.
The bill would require the government to sell anywhere between 0.5% and 0.75% of all Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service lands in those states in the next five years. It would require the land be used only for “the development of housing or to address associated community needs,” although it does leave that interpretation up to the secretaries of Interior and Agriculture.
The proposal has now received pushback from some of Lee’s Republican colleagues, particularly those who have long opposed selling public lands for commercial use, including senators from Idaho and Montana. Lee says there will be updates to the legislation that would further restrict what lands can be sold, mandating that those being sold be within 2 miles of a population center (for Forest Service lands) or within 5 miles (for BLM lands).
Axios notes that a recent Headwaters Economics report found less than 2% of the eligible public lands near towns with housing needs are viable for development. More than half (58%) of the federal land near communities with housing needs faces high wildfire risk. The report concludes that, “Developing housing on public lands may offer benefits in a limited number of communities, but it is not a broad solution.”
Newsweek has a substantial story on Sen. Lee’s proposal, and the backlash to it, that includes a map of the lands eligible for sale under the proposal. The New York Times also had a story.
NHC Outlines Objectives for Housing Finance Reform
In a June 17 paper on housing finance reform, the National Housing Conference (NHC) warned that the precarious mortgages that sparked the 2008 global financial crisis could return if regulatory safeguards are not kept in place as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac move away from conservatorship. As summarized by Bisnow, NHC
. . . is calling for the enshrinement of protections, adding that not doing so risks “a race to the bottom” amid the Trump administration's plans to remove the agencies from government supervision.
The NHC is also advocating for proceeds from any sale of the agencies to be prioritized for affordable housing.
“The path to meaningful housing finance reform remains one of the most consequential — and unfinished — legacies of the financial crisis,” the NHC wrote . . . .
***
While proceeds from the sale of government-sponsored enterprise stock are currently required to be used to reduce the federal deficit, the NHC said that could be changed. The nonprofit suggested alterations to the terms of the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements could allow those funds to be used on affordable housing without congressional approval.
News & Commentary
District of Columbia
Avalon the Albemarle Tenants Endorse WC Smith Purchase
Earlier this month, tenants at Avalon the Albemarle on Connecticut Avenue voted overwhelmingly to assign their rights under the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act (TOPA) to WC Smith. While the tenant association still needs to negotiate details of the contract with WC Smith, this means that the apartment building will not be sold to True Ground Housing Partners, which had proposed to convert the building to income-restricted, dedicated-affordable housing.
WC Smith offered the tenants a more extensive package of building renovations, but does not plan to convert the building to affordable housing. It will, however, remain subject to rent control.
City Paper Says Investors Aren’t Fleeing D.C. Because of TOPA
Writing in Washington City Paper, Suzie Amanuel pushes back on claims that the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act (TOPA) hinders investment in multifamily building construction — claims that are driving efforts by Mayor Bowser and some D.C. Council members to reform TOPA.
Mayor Bowser’s Rebalancing Expectations for Neighbors, Tenants, and Landlords (RENTAL) Amendment Act would eliminate TOPA rights for broad swaths of market-rate and low-income tenants. And Councilmember Robert White, chair of the D.C. Council’s Committee on Housing, has advocated for a blanket 15-year exemption from the law for all new construction or substantial renovations.
Amanuel says tenant advocates strongly dispute the claims that TOPA is the cause of investor flight or the decrease in new construction. She says a 2023 report by the Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and Economic Development found that TOPA was successful in preserving affordable housing and empowering tenants, including the preservation of more than 16,000 affordable housing units and the formation of more than 425 tenant associations. The study recommended increasing and expanding funding opportunities for tenants, strengthening tenants rights, rooting out bad actors, improving accessibility to information, enhancing data collection, and establishing a TOPA Improvement Task Force.
James Campbell, principal at Somerset Development, told Amanuel that while the bond crisis has been catastrophic for affordable housing construction, TOPA has no connection.
Campbell believes some TOPA reform is required to attract private investment back into the District. But he believes investors are pulling away from the District not because of the law itself, but due to the tolling of TOPA during the pandemic, which temporarily suspended the legal deadlines for tenants to exercise their rights.
Amanuel reports that the vagueness and fluidity in Mayor Bowser’s proposed bill that spells out how a building would qualify for the 25-year exemption has some housing advocates worried that it will completely erase TOPA’s protections.
Ribbon-Cutting at Buzzard Point
On June 18, Mayor Bowser participated in a ribbon-cutting for Phase 1 of The Stacks development at Buzzard Point, just south of Audi Field. Jointly developed by Akridge, Bridge Investment Group, Blue Coast Capital, and National Real Estate Advisors, The Stacks will provide more than 1,100 new apartments across three distinct residential buildings — Everly, The Byron, and Colette. More than 10% of the homes in Phase I will be reserved for residents earning up to 60% of the median family income (MFI).
Adams Morgan Tenants Seek to Form Limited Equity Co-op
An article by Zoya Azhar in Washington City Paper traces the efforts of tenants at the Park East Apartments in Adams Morgan to use the Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act (TOPA) to buy their building and form a limited equity co-op.
Park East residents are mostly middle-class professionals — teachers, security guards, service industry workers, and federal and nonprofit employees — and were uncertain of their income eligibility to receive assistance. D.C.’s Housing Preservation Fund, a key financing tool for TOPA projects in D.C. for example, requires that at least 50 percent of units be affordable to households earning up to 80 percent of the median family income.
Rather than negotiate to transfer their TOPA rights to a developer, the Park East tenants sought to create a limited equity co-op. Azhar goes on to detail the challenges of establishing such a co-op in D.C., including the difficulties of obtaining financing and new questions arising from proposed legislation to reform TOPA.
D.C. Metro Area
HAND Issues Updated Housing Indicator Tool
Housing&, the Housing Association of Nonprofit Developers, this month released its updated Housing Indicator Tool or HIT 5.0. The HIT tracks the D.C. region’s progress toward housing production and preservation goals, outlines the policies being deployed in each jurisdiction, and links racial equity and housing. A launch presentation outlining the components of the HIT and highlighting key data can be found here.
An executive summary says that Greater D.C. produced 25,930 units of housing in 2024 (compared to 21,325 units in 2023), but that building permits for new housing in the Capital Region decreased in 2024, as they have every year since 2021. The region saw 16,604 permits issued in 2024, down substantially from 25,415 in 2021. Eight jurisdictions in the region (out of 21) have 75% or more of residential land zoned only for single-family housing, and only six jurisdictions allow for multifamily development on a majority of residential land within a half mile of high-capacity transit.
Additionally, in 2024, the Greater DC region produced 4,542 committed affordable units, more than 1,000 more than any other year. Nevertheless this amount was still below the target of 13,567. Since 2019, 18,064 new committed affordable units have been added. However, the data reveals a pressing need for more affordable units across income levels, particularly for households with incomes below 30 percent of the area median income (AMI) for which only 1,480 units since 2019 have been built.
Federal Job Cuts Starting to Dampen Local Housing Market
Bright MLS issued a report on June 24 noting a number of effects from the federal government’s job cuts showing up in the local housing market:
Nearly 40% of real estate agents in the Washington metro area said they have worked with a client whose decision to buy or sell was due to federal workforce layoffs and cuts.
Home sellers were more likely to be retirees in the D.C. region than in other places, suggesting that federal workforce cuts and uncertainty had a bigger impact on older workers in the D.C. metro area this spring. “Federal buyouts provided older, often higher-income homeowners a chance to cash out and relocate, but the ripple effects are just beginning," the report stated. "As more impacted families list homes post-school year, we could see further price pressure across the region this summer and fall.”
38% of agents and brokers in the Washington region say that federal workforce layoffs and cuts are causing home prices in their local markets to fall.
Washington Business Journal [subscription req’d] says the data about retirees “doesn’t indicate a mass exodus of retirees from Greater Washington, but it does suggest that a fair number of the tens of thousands of federal employees who accepted buyouts from the Trump administration in recent months are older workers who don't plan to stay in the region.”
Washingtonian, Axios, and UrbanTurf also have stories on the Bright MLS report.
Apartment Rents Up 1.9% So Far This Year
Urban Turf reported on the latest monthly national rent report from Apartment List. In the D.C. Metro area, rents have increased 1.9% year-over-year so far in 2025, below the growth from last year. "Five months into the year, rents in Washington, DC have risen 1.9%," the report stated. "This is a slower rate of growth compared to what the city was experiencing at this point last year: from January to May 2024 rents had increased 2.5%."
"Washington, DC is the #13 most expensive large city in the U.S.," the report stated. "The median rent in Washington, DC is 57.4% higher than the national [median].”
Nationwide
State of the Nation’s Housing Report Released
On June 24, the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University issued its 2025 State of the Nation's Housing report. Chris Herbert, Managing Director of the Center, outlined 8 takeaways from this year’s report:
Renter cost burdens hit another record high, with the number of cost-burdened renters (those spending more than 30% of their income on housing and utilities) reaching 22.6 million renters (50%). This includes more than 12.1 million (27%) who are severely burdened, spending more than half of their income on housing.
Homeowners are also increasingly burdened by rising housing costs, partially explained by steep increases in insurance premiums, plus increases in property taxes.
As of early 2025, home prices are up 60% since 2019, and the median existing single-family home price hit a new high of $412,500 in 2024. “This is a shocking five times the median household income and significantly above the price-to-income ratio of 3 that has traditionally been considered affordable.” As prices rose, existing home sales dropped to a 30-year low.
New home sales increased by 3% last year, with many builders producing homes that were smaller or had fewer amenities, cutting prices, or offering mortgage rate buydowns.
Last year, monthly mortgage payments on the median-priced home rose to $2,570, 40% higher than in 1990. A buyer would need an annual income of at least $126,700 to afford such a payment and the associated taxes and insurance costs. Only 6 million of the nation’s 46 million renters can meet this benchmark.
As fewer households have been able to become homeowners, the renter population has grown, jumping by 848,000 in 2024. This demand is absorbing the wave of new multifamily rental units. In 2024, multifamily developers completed 608,000 new units, the most in nearly four decades, but much of this construction was at the upper end of the market.
Proposed reductions in federal resources for crucial housing supports come at a time of record-high homelessness. In January 2024, 771,480 people were homeless, a 33% increase since January 2020.
The future of U.S. housing is uncertain. Homebuilders estimate that the the Trump administration’s newly-imposed tariffs on construction materials will increase new home prices by $10,900 apiece, and reduced immigration could shrink the already-thin labor pool. Roughly a third of construction workers are foreign-born, about twice the rate of the overall labor force.
Homebuyer Down Payments Dip Lower
Redfin reports that the typical U.S. homebuyer’s down payment is $62,468, down by roughly 1% year over year, the first annual decline in nearly two years. In percentage terms, the typical U.S. homebuyer puts down 15% of the purchase price, essentially unchanged from 15.1% a year earlier.
Down payments are falling in dollar terms even though overall home prices are rising slightly because not all homebuyers make a down payment; nearly one-third of buyers pay in all cash. . . . It’s likely that the people buying homes with a mortgage bought cheaper homes, reducing down payments. That also explains why down payments stayed flat in percentage terms but declined in dollar terms.
***
Mortgaged homebuyers are likely purchasing cheaper homes because of affordability challenges: Mortgage rates are near 7%, more than double pandemic-era lows, meaning people are ultra-sensitive to cost.
Around the Blogs
At The Post-Suburban Future, Andrew Burleson proposes a compromise with NIMBYs: let them use deed restrictions, or what he calls “exclusion zones,” to serve the purpose that city-wide zoning ordinances serve in most cities, that is, to restrict the built environment and prevent change. Make them apply to a limited area, where homeowners have consented to have them apply, and make them expire (subject to renewal), such as after ten years. Burleson says “the one-size-fits-all, citywide approach to regulation is the heart of the problem”; we should let NIMBYs expend their energy on getting what they want for their own backyard, and only their backyard.
At this writing, Zohran Mamdani appears to have won the Democratic primary for Mayor of New York City. At Noahpinion, economist Noah Smith writes that he thinks Mamdani’s “housing policy — the thing that has most excited centrist liberals — would actually reduce housing supply from its already low level.”
[Mamdani says] that he’ll “triple the City’s production of permanently affordable, union-built, rent-stabilized homes.” So unless I’m reading this wrong, what it means is that he’ll keep total housing production roughly the same, but shift it toward below-market-rate rent-stabilized housing.
That shift would lower rents for poor people, since you have to be poor to qualify to live in below-market-rate housing, and more below-market-rate housing would get built. But because it would result in less market-rate housing construction, it would raise rents for everyone else. And overall, it looks like Zohran wouldn’t increase housing supply from the meager, utterly insufficient rates of the 2010s.
***
On top of that, Zohran’s rent control plan would make it harder to create more housing supply. Economists have studied rent control quite a lot over the years, and they generally find that it makes housing supply harder to build.
At Momentum to Build Community, Ryan Kilpatrick has a multipart series on “How to Make Housing Affordable.” In Part 1, he says that local governments have systematically limited the housing choices individuals can make. The fundamental problem is scarcity, and for as long as there's a housing shortage, there will be an affordability crisis. He sees three paths forward:
(1) Continue funding nonprofits and subsidizing housing for those who need it most. This is essential but insufficient — it's treating symptoms, not causes.
(2) Clear regulatory obstacles and let traditional developers build more. This helps, but has a fatal flaw: current developers depend on scarcity for high returns.
(3) The real solution is the abundance approach — create systems that support both large-scale developers and a "small army" of small-scale builders, developers and landlords who want to work with their own communities to create housing options that meet the needs of their neighbors.
In Part 2, Kilpatrick lays out why reducing minimum lot sizes, “a simple change to the text in a local policy can reduce housing costs by 20% - 40% — before considering any subsidies — while still maintaining single-family homes as the predominant housing type.” He calls it “a very simple adjustment that can reduce the average cost to buy a new home by $100,000 or more. These changes can make the difference between a middle income household becoming a homeowner tomorrow, or continuing to rent for the next decade.”
Other States
Berkeley Council Expected to Finalize Rezoning
On June 26, the city council of Berkeley, California is expected to vote on the final draft of its “Middle Housing” ordinance, which would allow the construction of more low-density, multifamily homes. Darrell Owens, a housing advocate and planning commissioner for Berkeley, wrote an op-ed explaining some of the relevant history:
In 1914, a developer of Berkeley’s wealthy neighborhoods invented single-family zoning for the explicit purpose of excluding non-wealthy families. The idea took off nationwide, leading to apartment bans and car-centric suburban sprawl.
By the 1970s, Berkeley, whose population was swelling with families living in new apartments, went further, freezing the construction of new housing citywide on the basis that halting population growth was pro-environment.
Berkeley’s Black population, which had been growing until 1970, immediately began to shrink as housing options dried up and families were pushed out due to rising costs. By 1980, homelessness had become a severe issue in Berkeley.
Meanwhile, families that would’ve otherwise lived in low-carbon, car-lite homes in Berkeley were forced to the suburbs, destroying thousands of acres of open space and farmland for new suburbs and freeways in hot climates with carbon-intensive homes.
Owens says the city council is poised to rectify this regrettable history by voting on the final draft of its “Middle Housing” ordinance. Many compromises were made to get to this point, but “Berkeley needs this ordinance if it wants to build its middle class.”
Owens talks more about the range of density limits under consideration at his blog, The Discourse Lounge. “Whatever allowable dwelling units per acre the council decides on,” Owens argues, “all neighborhoods, regardless of racial or income demographics, should have the same density limit. That’s the crucial point: to abolish exclusionary zoning.”
North Carolina House Votes to Ban Localities from Imposing Parking Minimums
On June 25, the North Carolina House voted 107-0 to pass House Bill 369, which would prohibit local governments from requiring an off-street parking lot to meet a minimum number of parking spaces per development or structure, regardless of the use or occupancy.
Calendar
June 29 — Deadline to respond to ANC 3/4G’s community survey regarding the 8 proposals to redevelop the Chevy Chase library and community center and add dedicated affordable housing.
July 7 — Special meeting of ANC 3/4G (Chevy Chase) to consider results of the ANC’s community survey regarding proposals for development of the Chevy Chase Civic Core site, 6:30-8:30, virtually via Zoom.
July 10 — Next regular meeting of ANC 3E (Friendship Heights & Tenleytown), 7:30 p.m., online.
July 15 — Next regular meeting of ANC 3F (Van Ness), 7:00-9:00 p.m., online.
July 15 — Next regular meeting of ANC 3A (Middle Wisconsin Avenue), 7:00 p.m., at the McLean Gardens Ballroom and virtually via Zoom.
July 21 — Next regular meeting of ANC 3C (Cleveland Park and Woodley Park), virtual, 7:00-9:00 p.m.
To let us know of something we should add, please email christopher.vaden78@gmail.com.